Deontology, Utilitarianism, and Virtue Ethics Essay

Deontology, Utilitarianism, and Virtue Ethics - strain ExampleDecisions and actions should be geargond towards fulfilling obligations and existing laws. Consequently, acts that hurt the expectations are considered ethical and those that do not meet the expectations are considered u nethical. The theory therefore offers no regards to peoples immediate welfare, may subject actors to meshing of interest, and it is not based on rule. Utilitarianism, however, focuses on consequences of an action or decision, instead of existing rules and obligation that a person has to others. According to utilitarian theory, negative and positive effects of a decision or actions are considered and net effects used to determine righteousness. Those acts and decisions that yield net benefits are considered ethical, unlike those that offer net harm. This establishes the basis of determining morality as a difference between deontology and utilitarianism as deontology relies on rules and obligations cha rm utilitarianism relies on effects of an act or a decision. Utilitarianism also remedies deontologys weakness of lack of rationale and this identifies a difference. Focusing on consequences also establishes consistency and therefore minimizes conflicts. However, the two theories aims at determining morality in actions and decisions (Manias, E., Manias, N., & Monroe, 2013). Analysis of virtue ethics, with the other two theories, also identifies both similarities and differences. The theory distinguishes rights and wrongs, just as deontology and utilitarianism.